Descripción del título

<P>This innovative monograph is of major significance for not only students and academics undertaking research on the history of Mexico during the long dictatorship of Porfirio Díaz, but also scholars specializing in the history of ideas, philosophy and science. Unlike previous discussions of positivism in Latin America, this book presents a detailed analysis of the English thinker, Herbert Spencer's original works as a necessary gateway into the discussion of the thinking of 'The Scientists'. Its principal purpose is to revisit the influential thesis of Leopoldo Zea which proposed that 'The Scientists' throughout this period were Spencerian positivists.</p><p>This book offers a revisionist analysis of the original papers of 'The Scientists', Francisco Bulnes and Justo Sierra, as well as their political and philosophical ideas and activities. This analysis demonstrates that their eclectic discourses used the ideas of the American Social Darwinists, and those from Spencer, Darwin, August Comte, andother European writers, concluding that 'The Scientists' lacked a clear leader and had an ambivalent relationship with Díaz. It interprets 'The Scientists' not as 'heroes' or 'villains', but as men struggling to appropriate European philosophical advances into their quest to modernise Mexico.</p>
Monografía
monografia
Rebiun24114116
https://catalogo.rebiun.org/rebiun/record/Rebiun24114116
m o d
cr cnu---unuuu
160806s2016 enk ob 001 0 eng d
9781781384381
178138438X
1781382565
9781781382561
UPVA 997923277503706
UAM 991008123466204211
CBUC 991001021890906712
CBUC 991010895042806709
UPCT u526702
NhCcYBP
eng
NhCcYBP
UNAV
972.08/14
23
Priego Martínez, Natalia
autor
Positivism, science, and 'The Scientists' in Porfirian Mexico
Recurso electrónico]
a reappraisal
Natalia Priego
Liverpool
Liverpool University Press
2016
Liverpool
Liverpool
Liverpool University Press
1 recurso electrónico
1 recurso electrónico
Text
txt
rdacontent
computer
c
rdamedia.
online resource
cr
rdacarrier.
CUP ebooks
Liverpool Latin American Studies, New Series
15
Incluye referencias bibliográficas e índice
This innovative monograph is of major significance for not only students and academics undertaking research on the history of Mexico during the long dictatorship of Porfirio Díaz, but also scholars specializing in the history of ideas, philosophy and science. Unlike previous discussions of positivism in Latin America, this book presents a detailed analysis of the English thinker, Herbert Spencer's original works as a necessary gateway into the discussion of the thinking of 'The Scientists'. Its principal purpose is to revisit the influential thesis of Leopoldo Zea which proposed that 'The Scientists' throughout this period were Spencerian positivists. This book offers a revisionist analysis of the original papers of 'The Scientists', Francisco Bulnes and Justo Sierra, as well as their political and philosophical ideas and activities. This analysis demonstrates that their eclectic discourses used the ideas of the American Social Darwinists, and those from Spencer, Darwin, August Comte, andother European writers, concluding that 'The Scientists' lacked a clear leader and had an ambivalent relationship with Díaz. It interprets 'The Scientists' not as 'heroes' or 'villains', but as men struggling to appropriate European philosophical advances into their quest to modernise Mexico.