Descripción del título
Is a monocratic trend flowi...
The text will show the development of a monocratic trend in Spain and Italy thanks to the use of variables such as fragmentation and polarization, the legislative initiative and the use of the government decrees. These aspects are analyzed here in a framework of double personalization that sees this phenomenon interpenetrating both the institutional front and that of civil society. The conclusion is that as the fragmentation and polarization of the legislative assemblies increase, the executive and especially its president acquire primacy. A paradigm shift in which today the "monocratic principle" seems to prevail over the "collegial" principle
En el texto se mostrará el desarrollo de una tendencia monocrática en España y Italia gracias al uso de variables como la fragmentación y la polarización, la iniciativa legislativa y el uso de decretos de gobierno. Estos aspectos aquí se analizan en un marco de doble personalización que ve este fenómeno interpenetrando tanto el frente institucional como el de la sociedad civil. A través del análisis se llega a la conclusión que a medida que aumentan la fragmentación y la polarización de las asambleas legislativas, el ejecutivo y sobre todo su presidente adquieren una primacía. Un cambio de paradigma en el cual hoy el "principio monocrático" parece prevalecer sobre el principio "colegiado"
Analítica
analitica Rebiun30904778 https://catalogo.rebiun.org/rebiun/record/Rebiun30904778 220620s2022 xx o 000 0 spa d https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/CGAP/article/view/82182 10.5209/cgap.82182 S9M oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/82182 https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/index/oai CGAP DGCNT S9M S9M dc Is a monocratic trend flowing in southern Europe? A comparison between Spain and Italy electronic resource] Fluye la tendencia monocrática en el sur de Europa?Una comparación entre España e Italia Ediciones Complutense 2022-05-26 Ediciones Complutense application/pdf Open access content. Open access content star The text will show the development of a monocratic trend in Spain and Italy thanks to the use of variables such as fragmentation and polarization, the legislative initiative and the use of the government decrees. These aspects are analyzed here in a framework of double personalization that sees this phenomenon interpenetrating both the institutional front and that of civil society. The conclusion is that as the fragmentation and polarization of the legislative assemblies increase, the executive and especially its president acquire primacy. A paradigm shift in which today the "monocratic principle" seems to prevail over the "collegial" principle En el texto se mostrará el desarrollo de una tendencia monocrática en España y Italia gracias al uso de variables como la fragmentación y la polarización, la iniciativa legislativa y el uso de decretos de gobierno. Estos aspectos aquí se analizan en un marco de doble personalización que ve este fenómeno interpenetrando tanto el frente institucional como el de la sociedad civil. A través del análisis se llega a la conclusión que a medida que aumentan la fragmentación y la polarización de las asambleas legislativas, el ejecutivo y sobre todo su presidente adquieren una primacía. Un cambio de paradigma en el cual hoy el "principio monocrático" parece prevalecer sobre el principio "colegiado" Derechos de autor 2022 Cuadernos de Gobierno y Administración Pública Spanish double personalization; fragmentation; polarization; monocratic government; Spain; Italy doble personalización; fragmentación; polarización; gobierno monocrático; España; Italia info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Musella, Fortunato. cre Fittipaldi, Raffaella. cre Cuadernos de Gobierno y Administración Pública; Vol 9 No 1 (2022); 31-45 Cuadernos de Gobierno y Administración Pública; Vol 9 No 1 (2022); 31-45 Cuadernos de Gobierno y Administración Pública; Vol 9 No 1 (2022); 31-45 Cuadernos de Gobierno y Administración Pública; Vol. 9 Núm. 1 (2022); 31-45 2341-4839 2341-3808 https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/CGAP/article/view/82182/4564456560636 /*ref*/Ackerman, B. (2000). "New Separation of Powers", Harvard Law Review, 113: 633-725 /*ref*/Amoretti, F., Fittipaldi R., Santaniello M. (forthcoming). "Poteri monocratici e comunicazione politica ai tempi della pandemia: dal governo Conte II al governo Draghi", en Comunicazione Politica, n3 /*ref*/Anduiza, E., Bosch, A., Orriols, L. y Rico, G. (coord.) (2014). Elecciones Generales 2011. Madrid: Centro de Investigaciones Sociologicas /*ref*/Balmas M., Rahat G., Sheafer T., Shenhav Shaul R. (2014). "Two routes to personalized politics: Centralized and decentralized personalization", en Party Politics, 20 (1): 37-51 /*ref*/Barber, M., McCarty, N. (2015). "Causes and consequences of polarization", Mansbridge J. y Martin C.J. (coord.). Political negotiation: A Handbook. New York: Brookings, pp. 39-43 /*ref*/Bargsted, M., Torcal, M. (2015). "Explicando la confianza política: economía o política?", en Desafección política y gobernabilidad : el reto político. Madrid: Marcial Pons Ediciones Jurídicas y Sociales /*ref*/Bauman, Z. (2001). The individualized society. Cambridge: Polity Press /*ref*/Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: towards a new modernity. London: Sage Publications /*ref*/Blondel, J., y Cotta, M. (coord.) (2000). The nature of party government: a comparative European perspective. New York: St. Martin's Press /*ref*/Blondel, J., y Thiébault, J.L. (coord.) (2009). Political leadership, parties and citizens: the personalisation of leadership. London: Routledge /*ref*/Boin, A., Hart, P.T., van Esch, F. (2012). "Political leadership in times of crisis: comparing leaderresponses to financial turbulence", L. Helms (coord.), Comparative Political Leadership. London: PalgraveMacmillan /*ref*/Boin, A., McConnell, A., Hart, P. (2021). "Governing the pandemic: the politics of navigating a mega-crisis". Cham: Palgrave /*ref*/Bolgherini, S., Musella, F. (2006). "Le primarie in Italia: ancora e soltanto personalizzazione della politica", Quaderni dell'Osservatorio elettorale, 55: 219-239 /*ref*/Bolgherini, S., Musella, F. (2007). "Voto di preferenza e 'politica personale': la personalizzazione alla prova delle elezioni regionali", Quaderni di scienza politica, 14, (2); 87-117 /*ref*/Bosco, A. (2019). "Dalla stabilità all'epidemia governativa: il caso della Spagna", Abenante D. "Democrazie difficili" in Europa, Asia, Nord Africa e Medio Oriente: competizione partitica, conflitti e democratizzazione. Università di Trieste: EUT Edizioni /*ref*/Bosco, A., y Verney, S. (2012). "Electoral epidemic: The political cost of economic crisis in Southern Europe, 2010-11", South European society and politics, 17 (2): 129-154 /*ref*/Bowler, S. (2000). "Parties in legislature: Two competing explanations", en Dalton R.J. y Wattenberg M.P. (coord.). Parties without partisans: Political change in advanced industrial democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press /*ref*/Bracciale, R., Andretta, M., Martella, A. (2021), "Does populism go viral? How Italian leaders engage citizens through social media", Information, Communication & Society: 1-18 /*ref*/Calise, M. (2005). "Presidentialization, Italian style", Poguntke, T., Webb, P. (coord.). The presidentialization of politics. A comparative study of modern democracies. Oxford: Oxford UniversityPress /*ref*/Calise, M. (2006). La rerza Repubblica: partiti contro presidenti. Roma-Bari: Laterza /*ref*/Calise, M. (2011). "Personalisation of Power", Badie B., Berg-Schlosser D., Morlino L. (coord.). International encyclopedia of Political Science. Los Angeles: Sage /*ref*/Calise, M. (2016). La democrazia del leader. Roma-Bari: Laterza /*ref*/Calise, M. (2000). Il partito personale: I due corpi del leader. Roma-Bari: Laterza /*ref*/Calise, M., Musella, F. (2019). Il principe digitale. Roma-Bari: Laterza /*ref*/Caprara, G.V., Zimbardo, P.G. (2004). "Personalizing politics: a congruency model of political preference", en American psychologist, 59 (7): 581-594 /*ref*/Carmines, E.G., Fowler, M. (2017). "The temptation of executive authority: How increased polarization and the decline in legislative capacity have contributed to the expansion of presidential power", Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 24 (2): 369-398 /*ref*/Casal Bértoa, F. (2021). "Database on WHO GOVERNS in Europe and beyond, PSGo". Available at: whogoverns.eu /*ref*/Casal Bertoa, F., Rama, J. (2021). "Polarization: what do we know and what can we do about it?", Frontiers in Political Science, 3 /*ref*/Celotto, A. (1997). L'abuso del decreto-legge. Vol. I - Profili teorici evoluzione storica e analisi morfologica, Padova: Cedam /*ref*/Cerruto, M., Facello C. (2014). "Il cambiamento dei partiti tradizionali al tempo dell'antipolitica", Quaderni di Sociologia, 65: 75-96 /*ref*/Chiaramonte, A., Emanuele, V. (2017). "Party system volatility, regeneration and de-institutionalization in Western Europe (1945-2015)", Party Politics, 23 (4): 376-388 /*ref*/Cordero, G., Montero, J.R. (2015). "Against bipartyism, towards dealignment? The 2014 European election in Spain", en South European Society and Politics, 20 (3): 357-379 /*ref*/Cormacain, R., Bar-Siman-Tov, I. (2020). "Legislatures in the Time of Covid-19", The Theory and Practice of Legislation, 8 1(-2): 11-48 /*ref*/Costa Lobo, M., Curtice, J. (coord.) (2014). Personality politics? The role of leader evaluations in democratic elections. Oxford: Oxford University Press /*ref*/Criscitiello, A. (2020). "Il potere normativo del Presidente del Consiglio in Italia", Musella F. (coord.). L'emergenza democratica. Presidenti, decreti, crisi pandemica. Napoli: Editoriale Scientifica /*ref*/Dalton, R.J. (2021). "Modeling ideological polarization in democratic party systems", en Electoral Studies, 72: 102-146 /*ref*/Dalton, R.J., Wattenberg, P.M. (2002). Parties without partisans: Political change in advanced industrial democracies. Oxford, Oxford University Press /*ref*/Dassonneville, R., Hooghe, M. (2017). Economic indicators and electoral volatility: economic effects on electoral volatility in Western Europe, 1950-2013, Comparative European Politics, 15 (6): 919-943 /*ref*/De Micheli, C. y Fragnelli, V. (2019). "Governability, fragmentation and normative production: a comparative analysis in six european democracies", Poliarchie/Polyar-chies, 1 (2): 45-74 /*ref*/de la Iglesia A. (1997). El goberno por decreto. Pamplona: Ediciones Universidad de Navarra /*ref*/De Micheli, C. (2020). "The Italian XVIII legislature: populism, law-making and procedures", Italian Political Science, 15 (2): 191-208 /*ref*/Dell'Atti, L., Naglieri, G. (2020). "Le fonti della crisi. Fra esigenze unitarie e garanzie costituzionali nel governo dell'emergenza da Covid-19", BioLaw Journal-Rivista di BioDiritto, 20: 135-143 /*ref*/Duverger, M. (1974). La monarchie républicaine ou comment les démocraties se donnent des rois, Paris: Robert Laffont /*ref*/Elgie R., Passarelli G. (2019). "Presidentialisation: One Term, Two Uses - Between Deductive Exercise and Grand Historical Narrative", Political Studies Review, 17: 115-123 /*ref*/Elia, L. (1970). "Governo (forme di)", Enciclopedia del diritto, Vol. XIX, Milano: Giuffrè /*ref*/Elia, L. (2006). "La presidenzializzazione della politica", Teoria politica, 1: 5-11 /*ref*/Fabbrini, S. (1993). Il presidenzialismo americano. Governare gli Stati Uniti. Roma-Bari: Laterza /*ref*/Fabbrini, S., Vassallo, S. (1999). Il governo. Gli esecutivi nelle democrazie contemporanee. Roma-Bari: Laterza /*ref*/Fernández Riquelme S. (2020). "Primera Historia de la crisis del Coronavirus en España", La Razón Histórica, 46:12-22