Descripción del título

Diferentes estudios han reportado que los lectores competentes se benefician de la presentación simultánea de palabras durante la lectura. Por otra parte, la existencia de representaciones ortográficas de las palabras parece facilitar el inicio de la codificación fonológica de la palabra contigua, que se iniciaría durante el proceso de articulación de la palabra target. Sin embargo, este beneficio podría no darse en los niños con dislexia, considerando su escasa competencia lectora. El objetivo de este estudio era investigar si los niños con dislexia se benefician de la presentación simultánea de palabras escritas y si esto depende de las características de los estímulos. Para ello, niños con y sin dislexia participaron en dos tareas de lectura. En la primera tarea, las palabras, manipuladas en frecuencia y longitud, se presentaban de manera aislada; mientras que la segunda tarea se trataba de listas de tres palabras, en las que se manipulaba la frecuencia y longitud de la tercera palabra. Los resultados pusieron de relieve las dificultades lectoras en el grupo con dislexia, con peor rendimiento que el grupo control en ambas tareas. Por otra parte, ambos grupos obtuvieron ventaja de la presentación simultánea de palabras, con tiempos previos a la articulación de la palabra menores en la presentación simultánea que en la palabra aislada. Sin embargo, este beneficio no se dio en los tiempos de articulación y exactitud lectora en los niños con dislexia, especialmente cuando se trataba de palabras largas e infrecuentes, sugiriendo que los niños dislexia no alcanzan el mismo nivel de preprocesamiento que los niños del grupo control
Different studies have reported that proficient readers benefit from the simultaneous presentation of words during reading. On the other hand, the availability of orthographic representations of words appear to facilitate the initiation of phonological encoding of the contiguous word, which would be triggered during the articulation process of the target word. However, this advantage might not be evident in children with dyslexia, given their poor reading competence. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether children with dyslexia benefit from the simultaneous presentation of written words and whether this is dependent on the characteristics of the stimuli. For this aim, children with and without dyslexia participated in two reading tasks. In the first task, words, manipulated in frequency and length, were displayed in isolation, while the second task involved lists of three words, in which the frequency and length of the third word were manipulated. The results showed reading difficulties in participants with dyslexia, with poorer reading performance than the control group in both tasks. On the other hand, both groups demonstrated an advantage of simultaneous word presentation, with shorter pre-word articulation times in simultaneous presentation than in single word presentation. However, this benefit did not occur in articulation times and reading accuracy in children with dyslexia, especially for long and infrequent words, suggesting that dyslexic children do not reach the same level of preprocessing as children in the control group
Analítica
analitica Rebiun31013050 https://catalogo.rebiun.org/rebiun/record/Rebiun31013050 220622s2022 xx o 000 0 spa d https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/RLOG/article/view/78445 10.5209/rlog.78445 S9M oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/78445 https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/index/oai RLOG DGCNT S9M S9M dc Palabras, mejor de una en una: los niños con dislexia ante la lectura de palabras presentadas simultáneamente electronic resource] Ediciones Complutense 2022-04-06 Ediciones Complutense application/pdf Open access content. Open access content star Diferentes estudios han reportado que los lectores competentes se benefician de la presentación simultánea de palabras durante la lectura. Por otra parte, la existencia de representaciones ortográficas de las palabras parece facilitar el inicio de la codificación fonológica de la palabra contigua, que se iniciaría durante el proceso de articulación de la palabra target. Sin embargo, este beneficio podría no darse en los niños con dislexia, considerando su escasa competencia lectora. El objetivo de este estudio era investigar si los niños con dislexia se benefician de la presentación simultánea de palabras escritas y si esto depende de las características de los estímulos. Para ello, niños con y sin dislexia participaron en dos tareas de lectura. En la primera tarea, las palabras, manipuladas en frecuencia y longitud, se presentaban de manera aislada; mientras que la segunda tarea se trataba de listas de tres palabras, en las que se manipulaba la frecuencia y longitud de la tercera palabra. Los resultados pusieron de relieve las dificultades lectoras en el grupo con dislexia, con peor rendimiento que el grupo control en ambas tareas. Por otra parte, ambos grupos obtuvieron ventaja de la presentación simultánea de palabras, con tiempos previos a la articulación de la palabra menores en la presentación simultánea que en la palabra aislada. Sin embargo, este beneficio no se dio en los tiempos de articulación y exactitud lectora en los niños con dislexia, especialmente cuando se trataba de palabras largas e infrecuentes, sugiriendo que los niños dislexia no alcanzan el mismo nivel de preprocesamiento que los niños del grupo control Different studies have reported that proficient readers benefit from the simultaneous presentation of words during reading. On the other hand, the availability of orthographic representations of words appear to facilitate the initiation of phonological encoding of the contiguous word, which would be triggered during the articulation process of the target word. However, this advantage might not be evident in children with dyslexia, given their poor reading competence. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether children with dyslexia benefit from the simultaneous presentation of written words and whether this is dependent on the characteristics of the stimuli. For this aim, children with and without dyslexia participated in two reading tasks. In the first task, words, manipulated in frequency and length, were displayed in isolation, while the second task involved lists of three words, in which the frequency and length of the third word were manipulated. The results showed reading difficulties in participants with dyslexia, with poorer reading performance than the control group in both tasks. On the other hand, both groups demonstrated an advantage of simultaneous word presentation, with shorter pre-word articulation times in simultaneous presentation than in single word presentation. However, this benefit did not occur in articulation times and reading accuracy in children with dyslexia, especially for long and infrequent words, suggesting that dyslexic children do not reach the same level of preprocessing as children in the control group Derechos de autor 2022 Revista de Investigación en Logopedia Spanish Dyslexia; Isolated presentation; Simultaneous presentation; Reading Dislexia; Lectura; Presentación simultánea; Presentación aislada info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Suárez-Coalla, Paz. cre Álvarez-Cañizo, Marta. cre Jiménez, Sebastián. cre Revista de Investigación en Logopedia; Vol. 12 Núm. 2 (2022); e78445 Revista de Investigación en Logopedia; Vol. 12 Núm. 2 (2022); e78445 Revista de Investigación en Logopedia; Vol. 12 Núm. 2 (2022); e78445 2174-5218 https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/RLOG/article/view/78445/4564456560456 /*ref*/Blythe, Hazel I. (2014) Developmental changes in eye movements and visual information encoding associated with learning to read. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23, 201-207. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721414530145 /*ref*/Boersma, P., y Weenink, D. (2021). Praat: doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Version 6.1.54. http://www.praat.org /*ref*/Cao, F., Bitan, T., Chou, T., Burman, D. D., y Booth, J. R. (2006). Deficient orthographic and phonological representations in children with dyslexia revealed by brain activation patterns. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 47, 10, 1041-1050. https://doi.org/1050. 10.1111/J.1469-7610.2006.01684.X /*ref*/Clements-Stephens, A. M., Materek, A. D., Eason, S. H., Scarborough, H. S., Pugh, K. R., Rimrodt, S., et al. (2012). Neural circuitry associated with two different approaches to novel word learning. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 2, 99-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2011.06.001 /*ref*/Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., y Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: a dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 1, 204-56. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.108.1.204 /*ref*/Cuetos, F., Martínez-García, C., y Suárez-Coalla, P. (2017). Prosodic Perception Problems in Spanish Dyslexia, Scientific Studies of Reading, 22 (1), 41-54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2017.1359273 /*ref*/Cuetos, F., Rodríguez, B., Ruano, E., y Arribas, D. (2014). PROLEC-R. Batería de evaluación de los procesos lectores, Revisada (5º Edición). Madrid: TEA Ediciones /*ref*/Cuetos, F., y Suárez-Coalla, P. (2009). From grapheme to word in reading acquisition in Spanish. Applied Psycholinguistics, 30, 4, 583-601. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716409990038 /*ref*/Davies, R., Rodríguez-Ferreiro, J., Suárez, P., y Cuetos, F. (2013). Lexical and sub-lexical effects on accuracy, reaction time and response duration: Impaired and typical word and pseudoword reading in a transparent orthography. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 26, 721-738. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-012-9388-1 /*ref*/de Jong, P. F. (2011). What discrete and serial rapid automatized naming can reveal about reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 15, 314-337. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2010.485624 /*ref*/Ehri, L. C. (2005). Development of Sight Word Reading: Phases and Findings. In M. J. Snowling y C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 135-154). Blackwell Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470757642.ch8 /*ref*/Engbert, R., Nuthmann, A., Richter, M., y Kliegl, R. (2005). SWIFT: A dynamical model of saccade generation during reading. Psychological Review, 112, 777-813. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.112.4.777 /*ref*/Forster, K.I., y Forster, J.C. (2003). DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, y Computers, 35, 116-124. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195503 /*ref*/Frith, U. (1985). Beneath the surface of developmental dyslexia, en K. Patterson, J. C. Marshall y M. Coltheart (comps.) Surface dyslexia: Cognitive and neuropsychological studies of phonological reading, Hillsdale, Erlbaum /*ref*/Grainger, J., Bouttevin, S., Truc, C., Bastien, M., y Ziegler, J.C. (2003). Word superiority, pseudoword superiority, and learning to read: A comparison of dyslexic and normal readers. Brain and Language, 87, 432-440. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00145-7 /*ref*/Martens, V. E. G., y de Jong, P. F. (2008). Effects of repeated reading on the length effect in word and pseudoword reading. Journal of Research in Reading, 31, 1, 40-54. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2007.00360.x /*ref*/Martin, F., Claydon, E., Morton, A., Binns, S., y Pratt, C. (2003). The development of orthographic and phonological strategies for the decoding of words in children. Journal of Research in Reading, 26, 2, 191-204. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.00196 /*ref*/Martínez, J. A., y García, M. E. (2008). ONESC: A database of orthographic neighbors for Spanish read by children. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 191-197. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.1.191 /*ref*/Massol, S., Mirault, J. y Grainger, J. (2021). The contribution of semantics to the sentence superiority effect. Scientific Reports, 11, 20148. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-99565-6 /*ref*/Meade G, Declerck M, Holcomb PJ, Grainger J. (2021). Parallel semantic processing in the flankers task: Evidence from the N400. Brain and Language. 219, 104965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2021.104965 /*ref*/Meixner, J. M., Nixon, J. S., y Laubrock, J. (2021). The perceptual span is dynamically adjusted in response to foveal load by beginning readers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001140 /*ref*/Perea, M., Jiménez, M., Suárez-Coalla, P., Fernández, N., Viña, C., y Cuetos, F. (2014). Ability for voice recognition is a marker for dyslexia in children. Experimental Psychology, 61(6), 480-487. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000265 /*ref*/Protopapas, A., Altani, A., y Georgiou, G. K. (2013). Development of serial processing in reading and rapid naming. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 116, 914-929. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2013.08.004 /*ref*/Rack, J. P., Snowling, M. J., y Olson, R. K. (1992). The nonword reading deficit in developmental dyslexia: A review. Reading Research Quarterly, 27, 1, 28-53. https://doi.org/10.2307/747832 /*ref*/Reichle, E.D., Warren, T., y McConnell, K. (2009). Using E-Z Reader to model the effects of higher-level language processing on eye movements during reading. Psychonomic Bulletin Review, 16, 1, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.16.1.1 /*ref*/Seidenberg, M. S., y McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96, 4, 523-568. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.96.4.523 /*ref*/Share, D. L. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55, 2, 151-218. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(94)00645-2 /*ref*/Snell, J., Declerck, M., y Grainger, J. (2018). Parallel semantic processing in reading revisited: Effects of translation equivalents in bilingual readers. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 33, 5, 563-574. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2017.1392583 /*ref*/Snell, J., y Grainger, J. (2017). The sentence superiority effect revisited. Cognition, 168, 217-221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.07.003 /*ref*/Snell, J., y Grainger, J. (2019). Readers are parallel processors. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 23, 7, 537-546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2019.04.006 /*ref*/Snell, J., van Leipsig, S., Grainger, J., y Meeter, M. (2018). OB1-reader: A model of word recognition and eye movements in text reading. Psychological Review, 125, 6, 969-984. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/rev0000119 /*ref*/Snell, J., Meeter, M., y Grainger, J. (2017). Evidence for simultaneous syntactic processing of multiple words during reading. PLoS ONE, 12, 3, e0173720. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173720 /*ref*/Spinelli, D., De Luca, M., Di Filippo, G., Mancini, M., Martelli, M., y Zoccolotti, P. (2005). Length Effect in Word Naming in Reading: Role of Reading Experience and Reading Deficit in Italian Readers. Developmental Neuropsychology, 27, 2, 217-235. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326942dn2702_2 /*ref*/Suárez-Coalla, P., Avdyli, R., y Cuetos, F. (2014). Influence of context-sensitive rules on the formation of orthographic representations in Spanish dyslexic children. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1409. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01409 /*ref*/Suárez-Coalla, P, y Cuetos, F. (2012). Reading strategies in Spanish developmental dyslexics. Annals of Dyslexia, 62, 2, 71-81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-011-0064-y /*ref*/Suárez-Coalla, P., Ramos, S., Álvarez-Cañizo, M., y Cuetos, F. (2014). Orthographic learning in dyslexic Spanish children. Annals of Dyslexia, 64, 2, 166-181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-014-0092-5 /*ref*/Wechsler, D. (2007). WISC-IV: Escala de Inteligencia de Wechsler para Niños-IV (2ª ed.). Madrid: TEA /*ref*/Wen, Y., Snell, J., y Grainger, J. (2019). Parallel, cascaded, interactive processing of words during sentence reading. Cognition, 189, 221-226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2019.04.013 /*ref*/Ziegler, J. C., Perry, C., Ma-Wyatt, A., Ladner, D., & Schulte-Körne, G. (2003). Developmental dyslexia in different languages: Language-specific or universal? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 86, 3, 169-193. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0965(03)00139-5 /*ref*/Zoccolotti, P., De Luca, M., Di Filippo, G., Judica, A., y Martelli, M. (2009). Reading development in an orthographically regular language: Effects of length, frequency, lexicality and global processing ability. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 22, 9, 1053-1079. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9144-8 /*ref*/Zoccolotti, P., De Luca, M., Lami, L., Pizzoli, C., Pontillo, M., y Spinelli, D. (2013). Multiple stimulus presentation yields larger deficits in children with developmental dyslexia: A study with reading and RAN-type tasks. Child Neuropsychology, 19, 6, 639-647. https://doi.org/10.1080/09297049.2012.718325 /*ref*/Zoccolotti, P., De Luca, M., Di Pace, E., Gasperini, F., Judica, A., y Spinelli, D. (2005). Word length effect in early reading and in developmental dyslexia. Brain and Language, 93, 369-373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2004.10.010 /*ref*/Zoccolotti, P., De Luca, M., y Spinelli, D. (2015). Discrete versus multiple word displays: A re-analysis of studies comparing dyslexic and typically developing children. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1530