Descripción del título

In this paper I examine the impact of the different naturalizing attempts in the philosophy of mind. l distinguish two different sources of these atternpts: the quinean proposal of naturalizing philosophy as a metaphilosophical program, and the project of defense of a substantive metaphysical naturalist thesis -that conflates naturalism with physicalism-, according to which our world is a "causally self-enclosed system" (Armstrong 1978). I argue that the main common denominator is the idea of rethinking the relationship between philosophy, science and common scnse, but that it does not imply that philosophy loses its own distinctive methods nor that philosophical problems are to be replaced by scientific ones
Analítica
analitica Rebiun36030451 https://catalogo.rebiun.org/rebiun/record/Rebiun36030451 241021s1999 xx o 000 0 spa d https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8850701 (Revista) ISSN 0326-1301 S9M oai:dialnet.unirioja.es:ART0001647467 https://dialnet.unirioja.es/oai/OAIHandler 21 DGCNT S9M S9M dc Acerca del impacto del naturalismo en la filosofía de la mente contemporánea electronic resource].] 1999 application/pdf Open access content. Open access content star In this paper I examine the impact of the different naturalizing attempts in the philosophy of mind. l distinguish two different sources of these atternpts: the quinean proposal of naturalizing philosophy as a metaphilosophical program, and the project of defense of a substantive metaphysical naturalist thesis -that conflates naturalism with physicalism-, according to which our world is a "causally self-enclosed system" (Armstrong 1978). I argue that the main common denominator is the idea of rethinking the relationship between philosophy, science and common scnse, but that it does not imply that philosophy loses its own distinctive methods nor that philosophical problems are to be replaced by scientific ones LICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI Spanish text (article) Pérez, Diana I. cre Análisis Filosófico, ISSN 0326-1301, Vol. 19, Nº. 1, 1999, pags. 31-45 Análisis Filosófico, ISSN 0326-1301, Vol. 19, Nº. 1, 1999, pags. 31-45 Análisis Filosófico, ISSN 0326-1301, Vol. 19, Nº. 1, 1999, pags. 31-45