Descripción del título
Bush v. Gore [the question ...
The Supreme Court's intervention in the 2000 election will shape American law and democracy long after George W. Bush has left the White House. This book brings together a broad range of preeminent legal scholars who address the larger questions raised by the Supreme Court's actions. Did the Court's decision violate the rule of law? Did it inaugurate an era of super-politicized jurisprudence? How should Bush v. Gore change the terms of debate over the next round of Supreme Court appointments? The contributors -- Bruce Ackerman, Jack Balkin, Guido Calabresi, Steven Calabresi, Owen Fiss, Charles Fried, Robert Post, Margaret Jane Radin, Jeffrey Rosen, Jed Rubenreid, Cass Sunstein, Laurence Tribe, and Mark Tushnet -- represent a broad political spectrum. Their reactions to the case are varied and surprising, filled with sparkling argument and spirited debate
Monografía
monografia Rebiun05179907 https://catalogo.rebiun.org/rebiun/record/Rebiun05179907 m o u cr cn| 020123s2002 ctu ob 001 0 eng d 9780300127003 0300127006 9780300093797 0300093799 9780300093803 0300093802 UPVA 997912000003706 UAM 991007724742304211 CBUC 991010886785706709 CBUC 991001004447006712 COO. eng. COO. OCLCG. OCLCQ. NT. YDXCP. IDEBK. OCLCQ. DKDLA. ADU. E7B. OCLCQ. OCLCO. OCLCQ. JSTOR. UNAV 342.73/075 21 Bush v. Gore Recurso electrónico] the question of legitimacy edited by Bruce Ackerman Bush versus Gore New Haven Yale University Press c2002 New Haven New Haven Yale University Press xiii, 240 p. xiii, 240 p. EBSCO Academic eBook Collection Complete Incluye referencias bibliográficas e índice An unreasonable reaction to a reasonable decision / Charles Fried -- Not as bad as Plessy. Worse / Jed Rubenfeld -- EroG v. hsuB : through the looking glass / Laurence H. Tribe -- In partial (but not partisan) praise of principle / Guido Calabresi -- The fallibility of reason / Owen Fiss -- Sustaining the premise of legality : learning to live with Bush v. Gore / Robert Post -- Can the rule of law survive Bush v. Gore / Margaret Jane Radin -- A political question / Steven G. Calabresi -- Political questions and the hazards of pragmatism / Jeffrey Rosen -- The conservatism in Bush v. Gore / Mark Tushnet -- Does the constitution enact the republican party platform? : beyond Bush v. Gore / Cass R. Sunstein -- Off balance / Bruce Ackerman -- Legitimacy and the 2000 election / Jack M. Balkin The Supreme Court's intervention in the 2000 election will shape American law and democracy long after George W. Bush has left the White House. This book brings together a broad range of preeminent legal scholars who address the larger questions raised by the Supreme Court's actions. Did the Court's decision violate the rule of law? Did it inaugurate an era of super-politicized jurisprudence? How should Bush v. Gore change the terms of debate over the next round of Supreme Court appointments? The contributors -- Bruce Ackerman, Jack Balkin, Guido Calabresi, Steven Calabresi, Owen Fiss, Charles Fried, Robert Post, Margaret Jane Radin, Jeffrey Rosen, Jed Rubenreid, Cass Sunstein, Laurence Tribe, and Mark Tushnet -- represent a broad political spectrum. Their reactions to the case are varied and surprising, filled with sparkling argument and spirited debate Forma de acceso: World Wide Web Ackerman, Bruce A.