Descripción del título
The U.S. government is facing the dual challenge of building its own interagency capacity for conducting stability operations while simultaneously building partner capacity (BPC) for stability operations. The purpose of this study is to assist the U.S. Army, the Department of Defense, and other U.S. government agencies in developing an integrated BPC for stability operations strategy. To accomplish this goal, a RAND Arroyo Center study team conducted an exploratory analysis of key strategic elements within the context of BPC and stability operations guidance as well as ongoing security cooperation programs, using a variety of analytical techniques. In general, this study concludes that BPC and stability operations are receiving a good deal of attention in official strategy and planning documents. However, insufficient attention is being paid to the details of an integrated strategy. A baseline analysis of existing security cooperation programs needs to be undertaken to comprehend the type, scope, and target of activities related to BPC for stability operations. An assessment of these activities should then be conducted, focusing on both process outputs and operational outcomes. In addition, the Departments of State and Defense should develop a rigorous method for selecting and prioritizing partners whose stability operations capacity they wish to build. Ideally, the results of these analytical processes will have a significant impact on the set of BPC for stability operations activities and partners, aligning relevant and effective activities with appropriate partners
Monografía
monografia Rebiun06423543 https://catalogo.rebiun.org/rebiun/record/Rebiun06423543 m o d cr cnu---unuuu 101101s2010 caua ob 000 0 eng d 9780833050731 0833050737 9780833049544 0833049542 UPVA 997921438803706 UPM 991005933680304212 UAM 991007637349504211 UCAR 991007754923104213 CUNEF 991000385410208131 UPCT u294790 NT. eng. NT. CLU. COD. UBY. EBLCP. E7B. OCLCQ. YDXCP. JSTOR. UNAV 355.4 22 Developing an Army strategy for building partner capacity for stability operations Recurso electrónico] Jefferson P. Marquis ... [et al.]. Santa Monica, Calif. RAND Arroyo Center c2010 Santa Monica, Calif. Santa Monica, Calif. RAND Arroyo Center xxix, 234 p. il xxix, 234 p. EBSCO Academic eBook Collection Complete RAND Corporation monograph series MG-942-A "Prepared for the United States Army." "The research was conducted in RAND Arroyo Center's Strategy, Doctrine, and Resources Program."--Pref Includes bibliographical references Introduction -- BPC for stability operations: roles, missions, and capabilities -- BPC for stability operations programs and activities -- Assessing BPC for stability operations programs and activities -- Analyzing potential partners -- Recommendations -- Appendix A: Defining capabilities for stability operations -- Appendix B: List of BPC for stability operations programs and activities -- Appendix C: Generic indicators for case studies -- Appendix D: Case studies -- Appendix E: Partner-selection models The U.S. government is facing the dual challenge of building its own interagency capacity for conducting stability operations while simultaneously building partner capacity (BPC) for stability operations. The purpose of this study is to assist the U.S. Army, the Department of Defense, and other U.S. government agencies in developing an integrated BPC for stability operations strategy. To accomplish this goal, a RAND Arroyo Center study team conducted an exploratory analysis of key strategic elements within the context of BPC and stability operations guidance as well as ongoing security cooperation programs, using a variety of analytical techniques. In general, this study concludes that BPC and stability operations are receiving a good deal of attention in official strategy and planning documents. However, insufficient attention is being paid to the details of an integrated strategy. A baseline analysis of existing security cooperation programs needs to be undertaken to comprehend the type, scope, and target of activities related to BPC for stability operations. An assessment of these activities should then be conducted, focusing on both process outputs and operational outcomes. In addition, the Departments of State and Defense should develop a rigorous method for selecting and prioritizing partners whose stability operations capacity they wish to build. Ideally, the results of these analytical processes will have a significant impact on the set of BPC for stability operations activities and partners, aligning relevant and effective activities with appropriate partners Forma de acceso: World Wide Web Marquis, Jefferson P. Arroyo Center. Strategy, Doctrine, and Resources Program